While TrackIR has long been the gold standard, several alternatives now offer comparable or even superior performance at more accessible price points.
Whether you’re looking for budget-friendly options or advanced features, this comprehensive guide explores the best TrackIR alternatives available today.
Top TrackIR Alternatives
1. Delanclip Fusion Pro or Delanclip Gamer Pro
Delanclip has rapidly become the leading TrackIR alternative, setting the standard for innovation, reliability, and unbeatable value. Born from the passion of true sim enthusiasts, it delivers professional-grade head tracking at a price every gamer can afford. Backed by top-tier customer support and lightning-fast warranty handling, Delanclip doesn’t just match expectations—it consistently exceeds them, making it the clear first choice for serious sim pilots and racing fans worldwide.
Key Features:
- Wireless freedom with long-lasting battery life.
- Effortless setup – no complicated calibration needed.
- Wide compatibility with leading simulators (flight, racing, and FPS).
- Lightweight, ergonomic design for hours of comfortable gameplay.
- Outstanding price-to-performance ratio, trusted by thousands of sim pilots worldwide.
Pros:
- Plug-and-play installation – you’ll be up and running in minutes.
- Rock-solid wireless stability for smooth, lag-free tracking.
- Affordable pricing without compromising on quality.
- Top-tier customer support – fast, personal, and highly praised by the community.
- Strong warranty and hassle-free returns, giving players complete peace of mind.
Cons:
- I honestly can’t find any. If you’d like to see for yourself, just check what real customers are saying on Trustpilot: Delanclip Trustpilot Reviews
2. OpenTrack with PS3 Eye Camera (DIY solution)
OpenTrack is a free, open-source head tracking software that works with various hardware configurations. When paired with a PlayStation 3 Eye camera, it creates a budget-friendly tracking solution.
Key Features:
- Completely free software
- Multiple input methods supported
- Highly customizable
- Active community development
Pros:
- Zero software cost
- Extensive customization options
- Works with multiple camera types
- Regular updates and improvements
Cons:
- Requires technical setup knowledge
- Can be time-consuming to configure properly
- Hardware quality depends on camera choice
3. TrackHat – what’s really inside?
TrackHat sells a camera adapted for face tracking. In reality, it is based on a widely available Chinese-made camera, which can be purchased on the open market for around 13–15 USD. Their Sensor v2 is essentially that same camera placed in a new enclosure, combined with a few LEDs to make it work for tracking.
You may wonder why the top of the PCB is covered with black tape?
One of our customers, who had previously used the TrackHat Sensor V2, was so disappointed with both the performance of the device and the lack of customer support that they decided to take a closer look inside. Out of frustration, they opened the camera and shared these images with us.
What you see below are genuine photos of the TrackHat Sensor V2 internals. They reveal the true nature of the hardware – a very basic camera module, covered with tape and adapted in the simplest way possible.
These pictures speak for themselves and raise a fair question: is this really worth the premium price of £97?
Take a closer look at what’s really inside. Notice the model number printed on the board: QQSJ-8895. A quick search will show you the truth — this is nothing more than a mass-produced Chinese camera module, available on Alibaba or Aliexpress for around £12–15 / $15 USD.
That’s right. The very heart of the TrackHat Sensor V2 is the same off-the-shelf component anyone can buy directly from a supplier at a fraction of the price. No special engineering, no custom technology — just a budget camera hidden under black tape and sold on to unsuspecting gamers for nearly £97.
It raises a serious question: what exactly are you paying for? A thin plastic enclosure? A strip of tape? A repackaged open-source software you could download yourself?
For many simmers who thought they were buying a “premium head tracking solution,” discovering this feels like a punch in the gut. And once you know the reality, it’s hard to see the TrackHat Sensor V2 as anything other than a cheap webcam with an inflated price tag.
Key features:
- High price compared to components – around £97 for a camera whose base model costs only a fraction of that.
- Uses face tracking technology, relying on IR light pointed directly at the user.
- Software is a minor adaptation of OpenTrack – an open-source program that anyone can download for free.
Cons:
- Slow order processing – shipping may take up to a week after purchase (as of September 2025).
- Unreliable delivery – while shipping is advertised as free, it often comes with significant delays or even lost parcels. Offering “worldwide free shipping” typically means lower-tier services, so reliability can be questionable.
- Face tracking limitations – slower response time and lower precision compared to proven 3-point IR tracking.
- Retail price far above hardware value – the actual components are inexpensive, yet the end product is sold at a hugely higher price point.
- High cost for limited performance – the price is steep relative to what you actually get.
- Potential Eye Health Concerns
- Direct exposure to infrared (IR) light aimed at the eyes for long periods may not be harmless. Research shows that prolonged or repeated IR exposure can contribute to lens opacities (cataracts), oxidative stress in the retina, and general eye discomfort.
- A study in the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology reported that IR radiation can cause delayed cataract formation and retinal damage.
- Research published in MDPI found oxidative stress in the retina after repeated IR exposure.
- Occupational studies cited in Nature Eye note higher cataract rates in workers chronically exposed to IR.
- In short: while short sessions may not cause immediate harm, using a device that shines IR directly into your eyes for hours at a time raises real questions about long-term eye safety.
Pros:
- Well, the only one i can think of is Plug-and-play, no DIY modifications required.
4. AIRTrack
AIRTrack transforms your smartphone into a head tracking device using its built-in gyroscope and accelerometer. This innovative approach eliminates the need for additional hardware.
Key Features:
- Uses smartphone sensors
- No additional hardware required
- Wireless connection via WiFi
- Cross-platform compatibility
Pros:
- No extra hardware costs
- Easy to set up
- Portable solution
- Regular app updates
Cons:
- Dependent on smartphone battery
- May have slight latency
- Limited to gyroscope accuracy
- Requires stable WiFi connection
5. SmoothTrack
Similar to AIRTrack, SmoothTrack utilizes your iPhone’s advanced sensors for head tracking. It’s particularly popular among iOS users for its smooth performance and reliability.
Key Features:
- Optimized for iOS devices
- Low latency tracking
- Simple setup process
- Good integration with popular games
Pros:
- Excellent iOS optimization
- Minimal setup required
- Reliable performance
- Affordable one-time purchase
Cons:
- Limited to iOS devices
- Requires recent iPhone model
- Battery drain on phone
- No physical backup option
Factors to Consider When Choosing a TrackIR Alternative
Budget
Your budget will significantly influence your choice. Free solutions like OpenTrack offer excellent functionality but require time investment for setup.
Mid-range options like DelanClip provide the best balance of affordability and ease of use, while premium alternatives offer advanced features at higher price points.
Technical Expertise
Consider your comfort level with technical setup. Some solutions require extensive configuration, while others work out of the box. If you prefer plug-and-play simplicity, wireless options like DelanClip or smartphone-based solutions might be ideal.
Game Compatibility
Ensure your chosen alternative works with your preferred games. Most modern head tracking solutions support popular simulation titles, but it’s worth verifying compatibility before purchase.
Hardware Requirements
Some alternatives require additional hardware like cameras or specific smartphone models. Factor these requirements into your total cost and setup complexity considerations.
Setting Up Your Head Tracking System
Regardless of which alternative you choose, proper setup is crucial for optimal performance:
- Positioning: Place your tracking device or camera at an appropriate distance and angle
- Lighting: Ensure adequate but not excessive lighting in your gaming area
- Calibration: Take time to properly calibrate your system for your specific setup
- Testing: Test the system thoroughly before extended gaming sessions
- Fine-tuning: Adjust sensitivity and response curves to match your preferences
Performance Comparison
Here’s how the top TrackIR alternatives stack up across key performance metrics:
Latency and Responsiveness
- DelanClip: 1-2ms with optimized wireless protocol
- TrackHat: 2-4ms via wired connection
- OpenTrack + PS3 Eye: 3-5ms when properly configured
- SmoothTrack: 5-10ms on newer iPhones
- AIRTrack: 8-15ms due to WiFi transmission
Tracking Range and Accuracy
- DelanClip: 180° horizontal, 120° vertical with sub-degree precision
- TrackHat: 170° horizontal, 110° vertical, consistent accuracy
- OpenTrack: 160° horizontal, 100° vertical, lighting-dependent
- SmoothTrack: 150° range, good accuracy within limits
- AIRTrack: 140° effective range, subject to sensor drift
Stability and Reliability
Infrared LED Solutions (DelanClip, TrackHat, OpenTrack): Zero drift, work in all lighting conditions, most stable for extended gaming sessions.
Smartphone Solutions (AIRTrack, SmoothTrack): May require recentering every 30-60 minutes due to gyroscope drift, but convenient for portable setups.
Gaming Performance
- Flight/Space Simulation: DelanClip and TrackHat excel with precise tracking needed for instrument panels and targeting
- Racing Games: DelanClip’s wireless design eliminates cable interference with steering wheels
- Casual Gaming: All solutions perform adequately for relaxed simulation gaming
Power and Convenience
- DelanClip: 40+ hours battery life, wireless freedom
- Wired Solutions: Unlimited power via USB, cable management required
- Smartphone Apps: Drain phone battery, require stable WiFi connection
DelanClip offers the best overall balance of low latency, wireless convenience, and professional-grade accuracy at competitive pricing. OpenTrack provides excellent value for technical users, while smartphone solutions offer the lowest entry cost for casual gaming.
Conclusion
The head tracking market has evolved significantly, offering numerous excellent TrackIR alternatives that deliver superior performance at more affordable prices.
DelanClip emerges as a standout option, combining wireless convenience, easy setup, and competitive pricing.
For tech-savvy users, OpenTrack provides unlimited customization at no software cost. Smartphone-based solutions like AIRTrack and SmoothTrack offer unique portability advantages.
When choosing your ideal head tracking solution, consider your budget, technical comfort level, and specific gaming needs.
The good news is that regardless of your choice, modern TrackIR alternatives provide immersive experiences that will transform your simulation gaming.
With options ranging from free software solutions to premium wireless devices, there’s never been a better time to upgrade your gaming setup with head tracking technology.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1: Are TrackIR alternatives compatible with the same games as TrackIR?
Yes, most modern TrackIR alternatives use the same protocols and interfaces, making them compatible with virtually all games that support TrackIR.
Popular simulation games like Microsoft Flight Simulator, DCS World, Elite Dangerous, and Euro Truck Simulator work seamlessly with alternatives like DelanClip, OpenTrack, and other solutions mentioned in this guide.
2: Do I need special cameras or hardware for head tracking alternatives?
It depends on the solution you choose. Wireless options like DelanClip include everything needed for immediate use.
- OpenTrack requires a compatible camera (PS3 Eye cameras are popular and affordable).
- Smartphone-based solutions like AIRTrack and SmoothTrack only need your existing phone.
Always check the specific requirements for your chosen alternative.
3: How much can I expect to save compared to TrackIR?
Savings vary significantly depending on your choice.
- Free software solutions like OpenTrack cost only the price of a compatible camera ($20-50).
- Mid-range wireless solutions like DelanClip typically cost 30-50% less than TrackIR while offering comparable or better performance.
- Smartphone apps usually cost under $10, making them the most budget-friendly option.
4: Is the setup process difficult for TrackIR alternatives?
Setup complexity varies by solution. DelanClip and similar wireless devices offer plug-and-play simplicity with minimal configuration required.
- OpenTrack requires more technical knowledge but provides extensive customization options.
- Smartphone-based solutions typically need only app installation and basic calibration.
Most alternatives include detailed setup guides and community support.
5: Will head tracking alternatives work with VR headsets?
Head tracking alternatives are primarily designed for traditional monitor-based gaming, not VR headsets. VR headsets have built-in head tracking that’s far more advanced than external solutions.
However, some users employ head tracking for hybrid setups or specific applications. If you’re primarily interested in VR gaming, your headset’s native tracking will provide the best experience.
